Low compression-force TPE weatherseals

ABSTRACT

A weatherseal has a stiffener and a foam profile. A first portion of the foam profile is connected to the stiffener. A second portion of the foam profile is joined to the first portion at a hinge. The first and second foam profile portions have inner surfaces facing substantially towards each other and outer surfaces facing substantially away from each other. The foam profile defines at least one continuous elongate lumen. A portion of the foam profile has a resin coating.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/043,298, filed Feb. 12, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,329,834, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/116,105, filed, Feb. 13, 2015, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

INTRODUCTION

Hinged swing entry doors that are designed for use in residential housing applications typically have an interface between the door and door frame that consists of a gap. The gaps are frequently filled with weatherseals (also called weatherstripping, weather strips, seals, etc.) of various designs that are often mounted to base structures that are pressed into “kerf slots” in the frame. The weatherseals are designed to maintain an effective barrier against unwanted external environmental conditions, especially the infiltration of air and water. The weatherseals helps to separate the internal and external environments by preventing the passage of noise, dust, heat, and light from one side of the door unit to the other through the gap. Certain weatherseals also have application in sliding or hinged windows and sliding doors. For clarity, however, the technologies described herein will be made in the context of hinged doors.

Most residential houses have at least one swing entry door that has a frame, hinges, and a latching mechanism that holds the door in place against a seal in order to isolate the indoor environment from the outdoor environment by reducing air and water infiltration. The hinge, latch, and head represent one general sealing challenge to weatherseals designers while the sill poses another unique challenge. Frequently, the hinge, latch, and head seals require seventeen feet of weatherseals while the sill requires three feet.

Foam weatherseals currently marketed under trade names such as Q-Lon (available from Schlegel of Rochester, N.Y.) and LoxSeal (available from Loxcreen Company of West Columbia, S.C.) are variations of open cell urethane foam molded in polyethylene film. Q-Lon in particular displays excellent recovery, low operating force, and low cost. In addition, the open cell structure allows the air to quickly evacuate from the foam when the weatherseal is compressed, reducing operating forces to minimal operating performance while maintaining adequate sealing performance. EPDM (ethylene propylene diene monomer (M-class)) rubber foam door seal profiles with a dense EPDM base mounting stem are also available, e.g., from Lauren Manufacturing Company of New Philadelphia, Ohio. Various weatherseals can include fin-shaped appendages, hollow bulb weatherseals with single or multiple openings, sponge rubber bulbs, urethane foam molded in polyethylene (PE) liner; coextruded foam bulbs, magnet/bulb seals, etc.

SUMMARY

This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, is not intended to describe each disclosed embodiment or every implementation of the claimed subject matter, and is not intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. Many other novel advantages, features, and relationships will become apparent as this description proceeds. The figures and the description that follow more particularly exemplify illustrative embodiments.

In one aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foam profile having an elongate axis; a stiffener secured to the hinged foam profile; and a resin coating substantially surrounding at least a portion of the hinged foam profile, wherein the hinged foam profile defines a continuous elongate lumen extending longitudinally along the elongate axis. In an embodiment, the hinged foam profile has a first leg secured to the stiffener and a second leg integral with the first foam leg, and wherein at least one of the first leg and the second leg defines the continuous elongate lumen. In another embodiment, the stiffener includes a first stiffener leg secured to the first leg, and wherein the second leg includes a second leg axis. In yet another embodiment, the second leg axis is disposed at an acute angle to the first stiffener leg.

In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a stiffener; a foam profile having: a first profile portion connected to the stiffener; and a second profile portion joined to the first profile portion at a hinge, wherein each of the first profile portion and the second foam profile portion has inner surfaces facing substantially towards each other and outer surfaces facing substantially away from each other, and wherein the foam profile defines at least one continuous elongate lumen; and a resin coating at least a portion of the foam profile. In an embodiment, when a bending force is applied to the second profile portion, the inner surfaces are moved into contact with each other. In another embodiment, when a compressive force is applied to the second profile portion, the at least one continuous elongate lumen substantially collapses. In yet another embodiment, when the bending force is applied, the foam profile deforms proximate the hinge. In still another embodiment, the at least one continuous lumen is defined by the first profile portion, and wherein the first profile portion has a substantially triangular profile cross section, and wherein the at least one continuous lumen has a substantially triangular lumen cross section nested in the substantially triangular profile cross section. In another embodiment, a second continuous lumen is further defined by the second profile portion.

In another aspect, the technology relates to a method of creating a seal between a door and a frame having mounted thereon a hinged foam weatherseal defining a plurality of substantially continuous lumens, the method including: moving a first leg of the foam weatherseal from a first position to a second position; and compressing the foam weatherseal so as to reduce at least partially a cross-sectional area of at least one of the plurality of substantially continuous lumens. In an embodiment, the first leg moves to the second position upon contact with the door. In another embodiment, the moving operation and the compressing operation are performed substantially simultaneously. In yet another embodiment, the moving operation is performed prior to the compressing operation. In still another embodiment, the method includes further compressing the foam weatherseal so as to reduce completely cross-sectional areas of all of the plurality of substantially continuous lumens. In another embodiment, when in the second position, facing surfaces of the foam weatherseal are in contact.

In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foamed TPE profile having a nominal height of about 0.650″, wherein the weatherseal includes a compression load deflection of less than about 1.25, when compressed to a thickness of about ⅜″ at a rate of about 1″/minute. In an embodiment, the foamed TPE profile defines a plurality of substantially continuous elongate lumens. In another embodiment, a substantially rigid base structure is connected to a first leg of the foamed TPE profile. In yet another embodiment, a resin coating at least a portion of the foamed TPE profile.

In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foam profile including: a first leg; a second leg extending from the first leg at an acute angle away from the first leg; and a hinge joining the first leg and the second leg, wherein the hinge is configured to buckle when the second leg is acted upon by a force, prior to substantial compression of the hinged foam profile, and wherein at least one of the first leg, the second leg, and the hinge define a substantially continuous elongate lumen. In an embodiment, the substantially continuous elongate lumen is configured to deform during buckling of the hinge. In another embodiment, the substantially continuous elongate lumen is defined by the first leg. In yet another embodiment, the first leg has a substantially triangular cross section and wherein the substantially continuous elongate lumen has a substantially triangular cross section nested in the first leg.

In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a stiffener; and a hinged foam profile having an exterior surface at least partially coated with a resin, the hinged foam profile having: a first portion having a first portion cross sectional area, wherein the first portion is connected to the stiffener and defines a first lumen having a first lumen cross sectional area similar to and nested within the first portion cross sectional area; and a second portion connected to the first portion and having a second portion cross sectional area, wherein the second portion defines a second lumen having a second lumen cross sectional area similar to and nested within the second portion cross sectional area. In an embodiment, the hinged foam profile is configured to bend at a hinge location between the first portion and the second portion. In another embodiment, bending of the hinge location reduces a separation distance between a surface of the first portion and a surface of the second portion. In yet another embodiment, the first lumen is configured to collapse upon application of a force to at least one of the first portion and the second portion. In still another embodiment, the bending and the collapsing occur substantially simultaneously. In an embodiment, the first lumen is substantially triangular.

In another embodiment of the above aspect, a first portion cross section and a first lumen cross section are defined by a substantially triangular-shape. In another embodiment, a second portion cross section and a second lumen cross section are both defined by a partially oval shape. In yet another embodiment, when the second portion is acted upon by an external force, the hinged foam profile bends and the first lumen at least partially deforms. In still another embodiment, when the second portion is acted upon by the external force, a surface of the second portion contacts a surface of the first portion.

In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a stiffener; and a hinged profile connected to the stiffener and having a first leg and a second leg, wherein the second leg defines a substantially continuous lumen therein. In an embodiment, the hinged profile further includes a hinge connecting the first leg to the second leg, wherein when the second leg is acted upon by a compressive force, the hinged profile is configured to buckle proximate the hinge prior to deformation of the substantially continuous lumen. In another embodiment, when acted upon by the compressive force, facing surfaces of the hinged profile are configured to contact prior to deformation of the substantially continuous lumen of the second leg. In yet another embodiment, the first leg defines a substantially continuous lumen, wherein the hinged profile is configured to buckle proximate the hinge and the substantially continuous lumen of the first leg.

In another aspect, the technology relates to a weatherseal having: a hinged foam profile having: a first portion; a second portion; and a hinged portion connecting the first portion and the second portion, wherein at least one of the first portion, the second portion, and the hinged portion defines a substantially continuous lumen. In an embodiment, the hinged portion is configured to bend upon application of a force to at least one of the first portion and the second portion. In another embodiment, bending of the hinged portion reduces a separation distance between a surface of the first portion and a surface of the second portion. In yet another embodiment, the substantially continuous lumen is configured to collapse upon application of a force to at least one of the first portion and the second portion. In still another embodiment, the bending and the collapsing occur substantially simultaneously.

In another embodiment of the above aspect, the substantially continuous lumen is substantially oblong. In an embodiment, the substantially continuous lumen is substantially triangular.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A-1D depict examples of hinged profiles.

FIGS. 2A-2D depict examples of weatherseals in uncompressed and compressed states.

FIGS. 3A-3F depict examples of weatherseals in uncompressed and compressed states.

FIGS. 4A-4E depict examples of weatherseals.

FIGS. 5A-5D depict examples of weatherseals in uncompressed and compressed states.

FIGS. 6A-6D depict examples of weatherseals in uncompressed and compressed states.

FIGS. 7A and 7B depict an example of a weatherseal in uncompressed and compressed states.

FIGS. 8A-20 depict examples of weatherseals incorporating one or more of the technologies described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Door Sealing Technology, Generally

Residential door weatherseals are most often compressed to about ⅜″ and are expected to seal effectively through the full compression range from the compressed thickness of about 5/16″ to about ½″ with the weatherseal extending to a full nominal thickness of about 0.650″. Many times, a door panel or frame has uneven surfaces and requires a seal that is compliant and uniform through the compression range to ensure a proper seal and closing force under all operating conditions. A typical residential door has about 17 feet of weatherseal in the gap at the side jambs and at the head. When closed, approximately 40% of the air that resides in a typical weatherseal is evacuated through the ends of the weatherseals in the amount of time it takes to close the door the final two or three inches, which can be as little as 0.05 seconds. Some weatherseals have more open cell structures than others. Weatherseals with generally open cell structures typically allow air to evacuate freely and rapidly through the ends of the weather strip, providing little or no resistance to the door's compressive force. Weatherseals with more closed cell structures resist, restrict, or even prevent rapid air movement through the cell matrix, causing instantaneous resistance to the door's compressive force upon closing. Some closed cell structures such as those found in some EPDM foams prevent all air from exiting through the cell walls, creating a short term deformation in the weatherseals shape until the internal and external gasses have attained pressure equilibrium. This occurs in materials that are semi-permeable to atmospheric gasses such as nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon dioxide.

It is desirable that a weatherseals have good performance in the following areas and be properly certified by AAMA, NWWDA, NFRC, and other voluntary accreditation bodies:

(A) Recovery/Resistance to Compression Set: The weatherseal should recover to a condition near its original uncompressed state after being compressed for a period of time.

(B) Weatherable/UV Resistant: The weatherseal should maintain dimensional and performance attributes after exposure to weather and UV light conditions.

(C) Water Absorption/Wicking: In cold climates, water absorption into the cell structure can cause problems when the water freezes and expands. The seal should allow air to pass freely through the seal matrix (not across the sealing surface), but should not allow water to penetrate the seal matrix for the risk of freezing.

(D) Compression Force: A weatherseal should provide the proper range of operating force, or CLD (Compression Load Deflection) while tolerating a range of forces from “slamming” of a door to the low operating force of a child or elderly person (so as to meet, e.g., ADA compliance). Too low a CLD will fail to prevent air and water penetration, while too high a CLD might prevent proper closing.

Types of Existing Weatherseals

Various materials may be used to manufacture weatherseals. These include those materials described above (e.g., open cell urethane foam molded in polyethylene film, EPDM), as well as thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) and thermoplastic vulcanisate (TPV).

Existing TPE Weatherseals

TPE/TPV weatherseal designs frequently include a solid foam core of thermoplastic elastomer foam surrounded by a generally impervious outer resin coating or skin material in order to provide protection from UV degradation and from physical damage. Such weatherseals are described for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,607,629; 5,393,796, and 5,192,586, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. Recent designs utilize a variety of surface options including covering with polyethylene film, providing bare foam areas (e.g., without a resin coating or skin material), applying low friction coatings, leaving large surface areas with no coating to reduce force and increase flexibility, and incorporating silicone and other additives to provide surface lubrication and protection. Certain of these designs are described in the patents identified above, as well as U.S. Pat. No. 7,718,251, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The technology described herein can benefit from all of the aforementioned surface treatments in addition to yet-to-be developed methods and materials in order to further enhance the product's performance characteristics. Such TPE foam weatherseals are available under the brand name Foam-Tite® by Amesbury Group, Inc., of Amesbury, Mass.

Existing TPE foam is generally considered a substantially closed-cell foam cell structure due to its resistance to water penetration. Microscopic examination reveals that many of the cells actually have cell walls that opened to adjacent cells to various degrees. During cell formation, these small openings allow the blowing agent, gaseous water (steam), to escape the cell structure and upon cooling, be replaced with air until equilibrium is reached between the internal and external pressures. Due to the substantially closed-cell foam cell structure, TPE foam weatherseals provide excellent resistance to water infiltration, which makes them very desirable for use in exterior door weatherseals.

However, due to the closed-cell foam cell structure, TPE foam weatherseals offer higher than desirable CLD, which ultimately restricts their use in such applications. As solid TPE foam is compressed, air that is contained within the cells is forced through a network of microscopic interconnections between the cells in order for the foam to take on its compressed shape. These interconnections have been seen to occupy from less than about 10% to greater than about 30% of the cell wall surface, depending on such foam-forming factors as polymer melt viscosity, melt temperature, melt strength, nucleating additives, and other material and operating factors and conditions. In the case whereby the foam has been coated on the surface, the only evacuation route for the ambient air that fills the cells is via the ends of the profile. In some applications, such as windows, where operating cycles are relatively slow, the air that is internally captive within the cell structure has adequate time to evacuate the foam structure through the ends of the weatherstrip. In swing door applications, however, there is generally inadequate time to allow the air to properly evacuate the cell structure through the ends of the weatherseals as the door is closed, especially when it is “slammed” shut. This phenomenon generates a higher than acceptable operating force. In a truly closed cell structure wherein the gas that fills each cell remains completely captive, compression of the foam does not evacuate the gas and the compression rises significantly as a function of the internal gas pressure.

New TPE Weatherseals Utilizing Lumens, Generally

In order for TPE foam weatherseals to be accepted in the marketplace, they should have performance and costs similar to more common urethane seals, such as those described above. In that regard, a TPE foam weatherseal should look like a urethane weatherseal when in an uncompressed configuration. This gives the perception to consumers that the weatherseal will be able to bridge gaps between the door and the frame. Additionally, a weatherseal that returns to its original shape provides the impression of robustness that the weatherseal will not fail after repeated compressions. Similar performance is also desirable. The TPE foam weatherseal should resist abrasion, which can occur, e.g., if furniture is dragged along the weatherseal (during moving). The CLD of the weatherseal should be low enough that the door may be properly closed, without having to apply additional force thereto. If the CLD is too high, the door may not close properly, which can be particularly difficult for users with disabilities. However, the weatherseal should collapse with little applied force, since the weatherseal needs to retain sufficient resiliency across its length so as to bridge any gaps between the door and the frame. Additionally, to the extent water is drawn into the weatherstrip, either due to material used or configuration, free-flowing drainage of the water is desirable.

Recent developments in thermoplastic elastomer foaming technology have allowed the design and development of new profile shapes, configurations, and features that allow TPE foam to match or exceed the performance of urethane foam weatherseals. For example, the technologies as described herein include, e.g., weatherseals that incorporate one or more hollow channels or lumens in order to provide easier closing force. Other unique performance features and characteristics are also described herein.

In a door seal weatherseals with one or more continuous hollow tubular voids or lumens that extend the full length of the weatherstrip, the atmospheric air that is contained within the cell structure in its relaxed state can be voided from the weatherseals very rapidly upon compression, allowing the door to close with minimal force through the last inch or so of its closing distance. The cross sectional design of door weather seals is most effective when designed as a thin, angular, hinged profile, due to the requirement of compressing the seal over a broad dimensional range with little change in compression force. The lumen technologies described herein may also be utilized in round, triangular, rectangular, or square profiles. Weather seals with approximately equal thickness and width generally have a continuously increasing resistance to force when compressed while a hinged weatherseals has a more flattened resistance for force until an upper leaf of the profile makes contact with a lower leaf of the profile.

The addition of one or more of hollow channels or lumens has been incorporated into a variety of window and door seal foam profiles in order to reduce the closing force. The lumen is most commonly found in a profile both for design convenience and for the shape's universal acceptance and performance. The addition of a lumen can reduce the closing force by about 30% to about 50%, depending on the foam wall thickness and foam density. Further reductions can be achieved by shape design modifications. For example, a “loaf of bread” shape causes the foam walls to collapse inward upon compression, further reducing the force required to compress the profile.

The addition of multiple hollow channels in the foam profile provides the weatherseal designer a degree of freedom heretofore unachieved. It allows specific designs to have hinge points, secondary compression zones that compress with a second compression force after the primary compression has taken place (e.g., shock absorbers), features that enhance the compression set resistance, create product volume at a reduced cost, and features that allow the air to quickly evacuate the cell structure. The last item results from reinforcing walls that range from two to ten cells thick that are allowed to vent into multiple longitudinal chambers as the coated foam structure is compressed.

In a door seal application wherein a thin, hinged design is needed for the purpose of creating a constant closing force over a large sealing distance, one single tubular lumen at the hinge point may not be adequate to evacuate sufficient air that is captive in the cell structure to maintain a uniform compression load. In this case, multiple hollow lumens may be incorporated to evacuate more air from the cell structure. The technologies described herein utilize one to five hollow tubular lumens formed in a foam matrix in a specific shape configuration, extending the size and sealing capability without adding to the operating force. The multi-lumen configuration interacts with the hinge portion of a leaf-type door seal weatherseals to allow air to freely evacuate from the cell structure in a very rapid fashion upon rapid compression, allowing low operating force and excellent sealing performance through a range of gap sizes. This combination allows for children and individuals with disabilities to operate doors with irregularities and improper installation. It also provides adequate cushioning effect to allow the door to be slammed closed without significant structural damage.

Shapes

The weatherseals described herein may be formed in a number of general shapes, the features of which can be described, e.g., in relation to the frame of the door. FIGS. 1A-1D depict exemplary shapes of hinged profiles that can be manufactured in accordance with the teachings herein. FIG. 1A, for example, depicts a weatherseal 100 a having a hinged profile 101 a characterized generally by a U-shape, which is defined by a profile curve 102 a. The profile curve 102 a is determined by drawing a plurality of lines L substantially orthogonal to the jamb face JF. The profile curve 102 a connects the midpoint M of each line L. Therefore, as depicted in FIG. 1A, this profile 101 a is substantially U-shaped. The U-shaped hinged profile 101 a has an upper leaf 104 a, a hinge 106 a, and a continuous outer surface 108 a. The operation and location of these elements are described more specifically below. The lower leaf 110 a is the portion of the profile 101 a connected to a first arm 112 a′ of a stiffener 112 a. The stiffener 112 a is the portion of the weatherseal 100 a inserted into the kerf 114 of the doorframe 116 a. In the uncompressed position, the upper leaf 104 a is disposed at an acute angle ϕ to both the lower leaf 110 a and the first arm 112 a′ of the stiffener 112 a.

FIG. 1B depicts a weatherseal 100 b having a hinged profile 101 b characterized generally by a V-shape, which is substantially defined by a sharp profile curve 102 b, which is again determined as described above. The V-shaped hinged profile 100 b has an upper leaf 104 b, a hinge 106 b, a continuous outer surface 108 b. A lower leaf 110 b tends to have a significantly different shape than the upper leaf 104 b. Regardless, the lower leaf 110 b is connected to a base structure or stiffener 112 b, which is inserted into the kerf 114 b of the doorframe 116 b. In the uncompressed position, the upper leaf 104 b is disposed at an acute angle ϕ to both the lower leaf 110 b and the first arm 112 b′ of the stiffener 112 b.

FIG. 1C depicts a weatherseal 100 c having a hinged profile 101 c characterized generally by an S-shaped profile curve 102 c, which is again determined as described above. The S-shaped hinged profile 100 c has an upper leaf 104 c, a hinge 106 c, a continuous outer surface 108 c. A lower leaf 110 c is connected to a base structure or stiffener 112 c, which is inserted into the kerf 114 c of the doorframe 116 c. In the uncompressed position, the upper leaf 104 c is disposed at an acute angle ϕ to both the lower leaf 110 c and the first arm 112 c′ of the stiffener 112 c.

FIG. 1D depicts a weatherseal 100 d having a hinged profile 101 d characterized generally by a profile curve 102 d, which is again determined as described above. The profile curve 102 d, in this case, includes a central linear section 103 d due to the elongate neck 105 d that is bounded by two hinges 106 d. The hinged profile 100 d includes an upper leaf 104 d and a continuous outer surface 108 d. A lower leaf 110 d is connected to a base structure or stiffener 112 d, which is inserted into the kerf 114 d of the doorframe 116 d. In the uncompressed position, the upper leaf 104 d is disposed at an acute angle ϕ to both the lower leaf 110 d and the first arm 112 d′ of the stiffener 112 d.

FIGS. 2A-2D depicts two examples of weatherseals 200 a, 200 b in uncompressed and compressed states and are used to describe, generally, stiffeners 202 a, 202 b, and lower leaves 204 a, 204 b of the profiles 206 a, 206 b. In FIGS. 2A-2B, the lower leaf 204 a is connected to the stiffener 202 a, which is inserted into the kerf 208 a of the jamb 210 a. The stiffener 204 a may include one or more teeth 212 a projecting therefrom that engage with an inner surface of the kerf 208 a. The lower leaf 204 a is connected to the stiffener 202 a along substantially all of the width W thereof (as well as along a length thereof, extending transverse to the width W). The lower leaf 204 a may be joined to the stiffener 202 a with an adhesive or other connection element, or may be co-extruded therewith by joining the lower leaf 204 a and the stiffener 202 a along substantially the entire width W, a robust connection is formed. The lower leaf 204 a terminates at the hinge H and, as such, defines two lumens 214 a, 216 a therein. The hinge H is the location of the profile 206 a along which bending or folding takes place when the profile 206 a is acted upon by an external force. As can be seen, lumen 214 a, which is located distal from the hinge H maintains a substantially consistent outer profile as the profile 206 a compresses to the condition depicted in FIG. 2B. This is because less deformation occurs to the portions of the lower leaf 204 a distal from the hinge H. FIG. 2B corresponds to the door 222 a being in a closed position and, in certain examples, inner surfaces 218 a, 220 a are not in contact in this position. Should inner surfaces 218 a, 220 a contact, however (e.g., if the door is out of plumb or the seal 200 a is otherwise overcompressed), lumen 214 a may collapse. Lumen 216 a deforms significantly between the positions depicted in FIGS. 2A and 2B due to the proximity thereof to hinge H. As such, air is evacuated from the lumen 216 a during the door closing operation, resulting in a reduced CLD of the weatherseal 200 a. As described above, if the inner surfaces 218 a, 220 a contact, lumen 216 a may completely collapse, depending on the degree of compression of the profile 206 a.

In FIGS. 2C-2D, the lower leaf 204 b is connected to the stiffener 202 b, which is inserted into the kerf 208 b of the jamb 210 b. Certain elements depicted in FIGS. 2C-2D are described above with regard to FIGS. 2A-2B and are therefore not necessarily described further. The lower leaf 204 b is connected to the stiffener 202 b along only a portion of the width W thereof. In examples, the length of connection may be about two-thirds or one-half of the total width W. Other lengths of connection are contemplated. By joining the lower leaf 204 b to only a portion of the width W, an overcompression volume V is formed (and is depicted generally as a dashed circle in FIG. 2D). The overcompression volume V provides a volume into which an upper leaf 222 b of the profile 206 b may be pushed if the door 222 b is overcompressed. Since the upper leaf 222 b may be moved into this overcompression volume V without significant contact with the lower leaf 204 b, the CLD of the profile 206 b remains low. The lower leaf 204 b terminates at the hinge H and defines a single lumen 214 b. The lumen 214 b is nested within the lower leaf 204 b, in that the lumen 214 b is defined by walls that are disposed substantially equal distances d from the outer bounds of the lower leaf 204 b. This can provide for predictable collapsing of the lumen 214 b as the profile 206 b is compressed. In contrast, a lumen that is substantially round, for example, would have walls that are not necessarily disposed substantially equal distances from the outer bounds of the lower leaf. As such, collapsing of such a lumen would be less predictable. The lumen 214 b folds predictably inwards (at a bulge B) as the profile 206 b folds at the hinge H. FIG. 2D corresponds to the door 222 b being in a closed position and, in certain examples, inner surfaces 218 b, 220 b are not in contact in this position. Should the seal 200 b be overcompressed, the upper leaf 222 b will enter overcompression volume V. Even further overcompression would cause lumen 214 b to collapse further, especially if the inner surfaces 218 b, 220 b come into contact.

FIGS. 3A-3F depicts three examples of weatherseals 300 a, 300 b, 300 c in uncompressed and compressed states and are used to describe, generally, function of hinges 302 a, 302 b, 302 c. In FIGS. 3A-3B, the hinge 302 a separates an upper leaf U and a lower leaf L. The hinge 302 a may be defined as a line separating the upper leaf U and the lower leaf L, along which the profile 304 a folds or bends when acted upon by an external force (e.g., when compressed between a door 306 a and a frame 308 a. In the case of the weatherseal 300 a of FIGS. 3A and 3B, the hinge 302 a is solid, in that it is not crossed by a lumen, as that element is defined elsewhere herein. Solid hinges 302 a generally display higher CLDs than hollow hinges (described below), but also display greater recovery than hollow hinges, since more material is present to force the profile 304 a to return to the uncompressed position. Additionally, solid hinges 302 a appear to allow for more uniform deformation of the profile 304 a above and below the hinge 302 a.

In FIGS. 3C-3D, the hinge 302 b separates an upper leaf U and a lower leaf L. The hinge 302 b may be a line separating the upper leaf U and the lower leaf L, along which the profile 304 b folds or bends when acted upon by an external force (e.g., when compressed between a door 306 b and a frame 308 b). In the case of the weatherseal of FIGS. 3C and 3D, the hinge 302 b is hollow, in that it is crossed by a lumen 314 b, as that element is defined elsewhere herein. Hollow hinges 302 b reduce the CLD, since there is less material to be folded at the hinge 302 b. When acted upon by an external force, the inner portion of profile material at the hinge 302 b (that is, the portion proximate the inner surfaces 310 b, 312 b) is under compression C. The outer portion (disposed on the opposite side of the lumen 314 b from the inner portion) is under tension T. As such, forces generated by the material opposite these compression C and tension T forces bias the profile 304 b towards the uncompressed position of FIG. 3C.

In FIGS. 3E-3F, two hinges 302 c, 302 c′ separates an upper leaf U and a lower leaf L. These hinges 302 c, 302 c′ are separated by a neck 314 c that may allow the profile to obtain a longer reach R from the door frame 308 c. More specifically, the upper hinge 302 c separates the upper leaf U from the neck 314 c, while the lower hinge 302 c′ separates from neck 314 c from the lower leaf L. Each leaf 302 c, 302 c′ folds or bends when acted upon by an external force (e.g., when compressed between a door 306 c and a frame 308 c). Typically, the upper hinge 302 c folds first, although complete folding of the upper hinge 302 c does not necessarily precede entirely folding of the lower hinge 302 c′. Otherwise, folding of the two hinges 302 c, 302 c′ is substantially similar to the folding of a single solid hinge, such as depicted previously. Additionally, since the neck 314 c has an axis A disposed substantially orthogonal to the frame 308 c, the neck 314 c helps increase the CLD as the profile 304 c is forced into the compressed position of FIG. 3F (as well as an overcompressed position, if the door 306 c is moved closer to the jamb 308 c for any number of reasons).

FIGS. 4A-4E depict three examples of weatherseals 400 a, 400 b, 400 c and are used to describe, generally, function of upper leaves 402 a, 402 b, 402 c. In FIGS. 4A and 4B, the upper leaf 402 a includes two lumens 404 a, 404 a′ separated by a rib 406 a, which is manufactured from the profile 408 a material. The upper leaf 402 a is the first portion of the profile 408 a that contacts the door 410 a during closing operations. It is this contact that folds or bend the profile 408 a proximate the hinge H. Use of two lumens 404 a, 404 a′ results in a higher CLD when compressed, due to the presence of the rib 406 a therebetween. This rib 406 a is disposed substantially orthogonal to the jamb 412 a as the profile 408 a is compressed, as in FIG. 4B. If the profile 408 a is overcompressed, this orthogonal orientation of the rib 406 a resists further compression and deformation, thus resulting in a higher CLD.

In FIGS. 4C and 4D, the weatherseal 400 b has an upper leaf 402 b that includes a lumen 404 b. The upper leaf 402 b is in the form of an outward-facing lobe (in that is faces away from the jamb 412 b, towards the door 410 b). This allows the upper leaf 402 b to fold so as to fill the space S between the door 410 b and the frame 412 b. Additionally, the presence of the lumen 404 b allows the upper leaf 402 b to further conform to this space S. Should the upper leaf 402 b not be pinched in the space S, however, the single lumen 404 b otherwise reduces the CLD of the profile 408 b.

Larger lumens can even further reduce the CLD. Such a lumen 404 c is depicted in FIG. 4E. In this example, the upper leaf 402 c includes a large lumen 404 c that is substantially nested in the upper leaf 402 c. A lumen nested within a leaf may, in one example, be defined as a lumen that is disposed within the leaf, so as to be spaced on all sides by a substantially equal distance d from the outer surface of the leaf. Upper leaves having enlarged nested lumens may more easily conform to irregular surfaces between a door and a door frame. Additionally, due to the large lumen, the CLD of the profile may be significantly reduced.

FIGS. 5A-5D depict two examples of weatherseals 500 a, 500 b and are used to describe, generally, function of ribs 502 a, 504 a, and 502 b. In FIGS. 5A and 5B, upper rib 502 a is disposed at an angle α to the face of the door 506 a when the door 506 a is in the closed position of FIG. 5B. A rib 502 a having a smaller angle α to the door 506 a provides less cushion to absorb impact, while a rib 502 a having a larger angle α to the door 506 a provides more cushion. Ribs 502 a disposed generally orthogonal to the door 506 a provide the greatest compression resistance and higher CLD. The rib 502 a deforms as the profile 508 a compresses. This places an inner portion 510 a of an upper leaf 512 a in compression C, while an upper portion 514 a of the inner leaf 512 a is in tension T. The lower rib 504 a is disposed generally orthogonal to the jamb 516 a and acts as a reinforcing structure to resist deformation. In FIGS. 5C and 5D, upper rib 502 b is disposed at an angle α that is substantially orthogonal to the face of the door 506 b when the door 506 b is in the closed position of FIG. 5B. Such a rib 502 b disposed generally orthogonal to the door 506 b provides the greatest compression resistance and higher CLD. In general, the ribs 502 a, 502 b, 504 a such as those depicted herein help maintain the shape of the profiles 508 a, 508 b. The further cushioning and impact absorption function of the ribs 502 a, 502 b, 504 a occur when the profiles 508 a, 508 b are overcompressed (e.g., compressed past the closed positions of FIGS. 5B and 5D). As the inner facing surfaces 518 a, 518 b contact, the ribs 502 a, 502 b, 504 a provide resistance to deformation.

FIGS. 6A-6D depict two examples of weatherseals 600 a, 600 b and are used to describe, generally, function of the outer resin coating or skin 602 a, 602 b. The skin 602 a, 602 b helps resist structural abuse and acts as a bumper against deformation without significantly increasing CLD. Profiles entirely lacking skin may be utilized, but abrasion resistance, water resistance, and UV resistance may be reduced, as these are primarily functions of the skin. FIGS. 6A and 6B depict a profile 604 a having a thick skin portion 606 a. The thick skin portion 606 a located as depicted (e.g., proximate an outer curvature of the profile 604 a) provides abrasion resistance against objects that may drag along the profile 604 a, such as furniture and so on. The profile 604 a also includes an unskinned portion 608 a disposed on an inner curvature of the profile 604 a. The unskinned portion 608 a allows for increased profile 604 a compression, since no skin is present to resist. The unskinned portion 608 a is substantially aligned with a lumen 610 a, which decreases inward compression I of the lumen 610 a. Vertical compression V is increased, however, due to the unskinned portion 608 a. FIGS. 6C and 6D depict a weatherseal 600 b having skin 602 b that includes a plurality of projections or fins 612 a, 614 b. The projections 612 a, 614 b can be formed integrally with or secured to the skin 602 b and are utilized to seal gaps between surfaces, without increasing the overall size of the profile 604 b.

The features and components described above in FIGS. 1A-6D can be incorporated into hinged weatherseals so as to achieve desired performance characteristics. In certain examples, lumens may be disposed in one or more of the upper leaf, the lower leaf, or the hinge, depending on the performance required or desired for a particular application. Multiple lumens in a single leaf are also contemplated and the ribs disposed therebetween can increase CLD (as compared to a leaf utilizing a single large lumen). The lumens may be defined by any shape, as required or desired for a particular application. Lumen shapes such as triangular, oval, ovid, bean, tear, etc., may be utilized. Lumen shapes may also be defined by their similarity to letters, such as U, C, D, O, and so on. As described above, particular shapes (e.g., triangular) may display particularly desirable performance, especially when in a configuration where the lumen is nested in a similarly shaped leaf.

The hinged weatherseals described herein may be utilized in standard entry doors, and as such, may be manufactured to particular sizes and dimensions widely accepted in the industry. FIGS. 7A and 7B depict exemplary dimensions of a weatherseal 700 for illustrative purposes. Individual lengths of weatherseals 700 may be manufactured in elongate lengths, e.g., cut from a single continuous seal. Regardless, each weatherseal defines an elongate axis that extends along a length thereof. As such, lumens defined by the weatherseal profile and similarly elongate along the weatherseal axis. One key feature of the weatherseal 700 is the uncompressed profile height P, which is the distance between a maximum extent of the upper leaf U and the door jamb J. Weatherseals such as those described herein can be manufactured with nominal profile heights P of about two-thirds of an inch to about one inch. More specific examples include heights of about 0.650″, about 0.730″, about 0.750″, about 0.825″, and about 0.928″. In such examples, the weatherseals may collapse to a height of about half of their uncompressed profile height P, without being subject to overcompression. It is desirable, however, that weatherseals manufactured in accordance with the disclosures herein be completely functional in a range of about one-eighth inch to about one-half inch. In examples, the cross-sectional area of the inner lumens L may decrease to between about 25% to about 50% of their original area when the weatherseal is in the closed position of FIG. 7B. A collapse of about 30% has also been discovered to be acceptable. Such collapsing allows air to be sufficiently evacuated from the lumens, so as to decrease CLD. Upon compression to an overcompressed state (e.g., beyond the compressed state of FIG. 7B), the lumens L may completely collapse, depending on the degree of compression.

Certain ratios of dimensions have been determined to be particularly desirable, as they have a positive effect on performance of the weatherseal 700. For example, a hinge distance D from the jamb J to the hinge H may be about 30% to about 50% of the total profile height P. Hinge distances D in this range have been discovered to result in fairly predictable bending or folding of the hinge H, while ensuring that the outer curvature C remains substantially even with a face of the jamb J (depicted by the dotted line in FIG. 7B) when in the compressed state. Additionally, profile width W should be sized to reduce the possibility of binding (where the upper leaf U is pinched between the door D and the adjacent frame F). This prevents the outer curvature C from being damaged or detracting from the aesthetics of the door panel DP. In other examples, the hinge distance D may be about 40% of the total profile height P. In a weatherseal having a profile height P of about 0.650″, this would result in a hinge distance D of about 0.260″. Ratios of a hinge thickness T to the profile height P are also relevant, especially in solid hinges, to allow for sufficient recovery. For example, a hinge thickness T of less than about 7% of the profile height H does not recover well, while a hinge thickness T of greater than about 23% displays too much rigidity and resists bending. A hinge thickness T of about 15% of the profile height has been determined to be desirable in certain examples. Wall thickness t (that is, the distance between a lumen L and an outer surface of the profile, as well as the distance between adjacent lumens L) also affects CLD. Depending on the materials used and the manufacturing processes, the wall thickness t may be about 3% of the total profile height P. Wall thickness t as thin as 0.020″ are contemplated and have displayed desirable results.

The weatherseals described herein may be manufactured in accordance with processes now known or developed in the future. Profiles may be cut from extruded, cooled pieces of foam material utilizing laser cutting processes, hot wire cutting processes, or other processes. The weatherseals may be cut from a rotary blade and formed into a final shape. For example, the weatherseal may be slit open, machined with a high speed cutter to form the lumen, coated to seal the exposed ends, then mounted to a substrate. Flexible adhesive systems can be used to assemble segments in a clamshell configuration by passing two elongated machined strips of foam over an adhesive lick roll and joining the strips together, thus forming the lumens. Other methods of manufacture include laminating multiple elongates subcomponent foam rod-shaped extrusions into a shape with a set of guides and rollers using a combination of heat and coating materials. Small foam beads or assembled tubes with cellular walls may be fused together in a continuous shape. The weatherstrip or portions thereof may be 3D printed with a modified Stratasys or similar printer. Lumens formed within the profiles may be cut by similar technologies, or may be machined or otherwise formed in the profiles utilizing, e.g., elongate drilling bits or other machining tools.

Desirable manufacturing processes also include extrusion and co-extrusion processes, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,607,629; 5,393,796, and 5,192,586, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. U.S. Pat. No. 7,718,251 also describes fabric-clad foam weatherseals, and such technologies may also be incorporated into the hinged, hollow profile technologies described herein. Electrical discharge machining (EDM) methods and design innovations have led to production of extrusion dies and back plates that may be used to produce complex profiles having one or more lumens, varied skin thicknesses, and other features. Very thin die openings with very delicate mandrel spider leg supports allow for unique foam shape control for very thin outer and inner reinforcing walls. Thin die openings also allow the foam to “knit” back together, creating a seamless finished product. The thin dies also allow a shape to maintain an inflated structure with an inner network of inner reinforcing walls or ribs, thus providing a process to design and produce, e.g., very large, complex multi-hollow foam profiles. Back-plates can be used that approximate the shape of the profile and guide the melt in a predetermined manner toward specific areas of the front plate.

The dies may be used to produce profiles having walls only three cells thick in certain locations. TPE foam cells vary from 0.010″-0.050″ diameter, depending on the polymer composition and the operating parameters. The cells are somewhat interactive with adjacent cells via random openings in their walls, allowing a restricted flow of air through the cell matrix. This allows air to be evacuated upon foam compression and to be returned to the cell matrix upon de-compression. The dies provide good shape control since the cells expand laterally, with minimal distortion, and allow for precise flexibility in areas designed to be hinges. Thin internal walls may need smaller cell structure with lower porosity in order to limit internal off-gassing while achieving low densities. Internal off-gassing inflates and distends lumens and can be controlled during the cooling process. Further development and control of foam cell size and density through process controls, base material changes, and additives may control rate of off-gassing during cell formation.

Materials utilized in the manufacture of the described weatherseals are identified in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,607,629; 5,393,796; and 5,192,586, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. Materials also include SANTOPRENE®, manufactured by the ExxonMobil Corporation; Sarlink manufactured by Teknor Apex Company; and Elastron Thermoplastic Elastomers, manufactured by Elastron Kimya A.S. Thermoset components may be applied during manufacture to improve compression set resistance. Lumens may also be formed in EPDM or urethane profiles.

A number of example weatherseals incorporating certain technologies described herein, are depicted below. In general, all of the following examples include a profile, a stiffener, an outer skin or resin coating, upper and lower leaves integral with each other (e.g., joined at a hinge), and one or more lumens in various locations. Further details regarding certain of these aspects for particular examples are described further below. A person of skill in the art, upon reading the above disclosure and following examples, will be able to produce further differing examples.

Example 1

FIGS. 8A-8B depict a first example of a weatherseal W1 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W1 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC1 and five lumens 1-5. Lumen 3 is disposed at the hinge H1, thus, the hinge H1 is a hollow type. The large curved lumen 3 adjacent to the hinge H1 reduces the CLD while the two pairs of lumens 1-2 (in an upper leaf U1) and 4-5 (in a lower leaf L1) further reduce the CLD while providing free flowing drainage, thus preventing accumulation of water. The single rib R1 within each leaf U1, L1 acts as a reinforcing structure to maintain product shape as well as a cushion to absorb impact.

Example 2

FIGS. 9A-9B depict a second example of a weatherseal W2 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W2 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC2 and three lumens 1-3. The weatherseal W2 is a similar hinge configuration to EXAMPLE 1, but also includes a single lumen 1, 3 in each leaf U2, L2. These lumens 1, 3, provide a lower CLD when the weatherseal W2 is overcompressed, as when a door is mounted out-of-plumb or hardware is mounted so as to compress the weatherseal W2 to less than a designed gap (e.g., ⅜″). While in the closed position in a door gap, the hinge H2 deforms such that the outer layer of foam remains under tension and the inner layer remains under compression, as described above for hollow hinges. As the weatherseal W2 is compressed, the lumen 2 is collapsed and the forces are distributed over a wide area, creating an acceptable balance between low CLD and good recovery.

Example 3

FIGS. 10A-10B depict a third example of a weatherseal W3 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W3 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC3 and four lumens 1-4. Rib R3 in the upper leaf U3 is disposed at an angle to the jamb J3 and door D3, which causes tension and compression forces, as described above, during closing operations and overcompression. Rib R3′, on the other hand, is substantially orthogonal to the jamb J3 and door D3, providing impact resistance during overcompression. Hinge H3 is solid, and the lumens 2, 3 disposed proximate thereto deform significantly during bending. Due to the angled rib R3, this causes significant deformation of lumen 1. The orthongal rib R3′ limits significant deformation of the lumen 4, until overcompression occurs.

Example 4

FIGS. 11A-11B depict a fourth example of a weatherseal W4 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W4 includes a V-shaped profile curve PC4 and three lumens 1-3. The weatherseal W4 includes a narrow, solid hinge H4, a triangular lower leaf L4, and an outer flexible skin S4 that mounts flush to the jamb J4. This allows the flexible skin S4 to seal tight against the jamb J4 thereby creating a positive seal. The solid hinge H4 provides a solid volume of foam to compress. This distributes the deformation forces above and below the hinge H4, providing a larger volume of foam compression while maintaining an acceptable balance between CLD and recovery. The triangular lumen 3 is nested within the lower leaf L4. As such, its sides are substantially parallel with, and disposed a consistent distance d from the outer surface of the lower leaf L4. Thus, the lumen 3 deforms in a unique manner, folding and buckling B as the weatherseal W4 is compressed into the compressed state of FIG. 11B. This buckling B enhances the low CLD. Additionally, the configuration of the lower leaf L4 also results in the presence of an overcompression volume V4, into which the upper leaf U4 may be moved, should overcompression occur.

Example 5

FIGS. 12A-12B depict a fifth example of a weatherseal W5 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W5 includes a profile curve PC5 defined by a central linear neck section N5 that is bounded by two hinges H5, H5′. Three lumens 1-3 are present. The two hinges H5, H5′ provide secondary relief when the door D5 is closed. On the hinge side of the door D5, the upper hinge H5 bends, after which the lower hinge H5′ becomes the active hinge point. On the lock side of the door D5, the upper hinge H5 becomes active as the door D5 closes in a straight downward fashion. An additional feature is a thickened, heavily reinforced outer skin S5 on the lower and side surfaces of the lower leaf L5. These surfaces S5 remain exposed to ambient conditions when the door D5 is closed and exposed to structural abuse when the door D5 is open, during such times as when furniture or other large objects are being moved through the doorway. The thicker skin surface S5 acts as a “bumper” while it does not significantly detract from the desired low CLD. Additionally, the configuration of the lower leaf L5 also results in the presence of an overcompression volume V5, into which the upper leaf U5 may be moved, should overcompression occur.

Example 6

FIGS. 13A-13B depict a sixth example of a weatherseal W6 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W6 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC6 and three lumens 1-3. The weatherseal W6 includes a small crescent shaped lumen 2 at the hinge H6 designed to minimize the CLD, accompanied by a relatively stiff upper leaf U6 that is designed to fold in a uniform manner, driving the majority of the folding and deformation into the lower leaf L6 of the weatherseal W6. The upper leaf U6 is fairly stiff because the lumen 1 is formed in only a small portion thereof. As such, the hinge H6 flexes more precisely, protecting and sealing the full gap from the frame F6 to the door D6. Additionally, the configuration of the lower leaf L6 also results in the presence of an overcompression volume V6, into which the upper leaf U6 may be moved, should overcompression occur.

Example 7

FIGS. 14A-14B depict a seventh example of a weatherseal W7 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W7 includes a V-shaped profile curve PC7 and two lumens 1-2. The weatherseal W7 relies upon a very narrow hinge H7 located at a distance D7 approximately 0.230″ above the jamb J7. As such, the hinge H7 is located at about 40% of the profile height P7. The weatherseal W7 includes a triangular lower leaf L7 having a nested triangular lumen 2 that accommodates the compression deformation caused by door DP7 closing. The upper lumen 1 provides relief from overcompression or in the event that the tip of the upper leaf U7 gets caught between the door DP7 and the door frame F7. An overcompression volume V7 is also present.

Example 8

FIGS. 14A-14B depict a eighth example of a weatherseal W8 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W8 is of the same design with many of the same features as weatherseal W7. As such, components shared with that of weatherseal W7 are not described further. Weatherseal W8, however, includes a sealing feature enhancement of two sealing fins F8, F8′. Sealing fin F8 is disposed at the tip of the upper leaf U8 and reduces or eliminates the penetration of air and water. Sealing fin F8′ is disposed at the point of entrance to the saw kerf K8 that is designed and constructed as a receiving channel for mounting the weatherseal W8. This sealing fin F8′ can limit infiltration of water into the kerf K8.

Example 9

FIGS. 16A-16B depict a ninth example of a weatherseal W9 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W9 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC9 and three lumens 1-3. The upper leaf U9 is in the form of an inward-facing bulbous lobe that extends into the overcompression volume V9 so as to effectively seal the space between the door D9 and the frame F9 in the closed position. It also provides an effective cushion in the event of over compression or door slamming. The hinge H9 is relatively solid and the lower leaf L9 is triangular with a nested triangle lumen 3.

Example 10

FIGS. 17A-17B depict a tenth example of a weatherseal W10 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W10 includes an S-shaped profile curve PC10, two lumens 1-2, and a solid hinge H10. The upper leaf U10 is in the form of an outwardly-facing bulb and includes a lumen 1 that allows the tip of the upper leaf U10 to be compressed between the door D10 and the frame F10. This creates a superior seal to prevent penetration of air and water through the door gap. The triangular lower leaf L10 allows ease of compression to less than 1 pound per foot at the required gap (e.g., ⅜″ nominal).

Example 11

FIGS. 18A-18B depict a eleventh example of a weatherseal W11 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in uncompressed and compressed states, respectively. The weatherseal W11 includes a U-shaped profile curve PC11, three lumens 1-3, and a hollow hinge H11. In order to reduce the CLD to 0.6 pounds per foot or less deflected to a ⅜″ gap, the weatherseal W11 features an uncoated portion UC11 at an interior curve of the weatherseal W11. This uncoated portion UC11 allows for ease of foam compression without the resistance of the flexible skin layer 511. In combination with the lumen 2 at the hinge H11, the profile is allowed to compress in two planes: inward to collapse the hollow and vertically above the jamb J11. This action reduces CLD and aids recovery.

Example 12

FIG. 19 depicts a twelfth example of a weatherseal W12 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in an uncompressed state. The weatherseal W12 includes a profile curve PC12 defined by a central linear neck section N12 that is bounded by two hinges H12, H12′. Two lumens 1-2 are present. The two hinges H12, H12′ provide secondary relief when the door is closed. On the hinge side of the door, the upper hinge H12 bends, after which the lower hinge H12′ becomes the active hinge point. On the lock side of the door, the upper hinge H12 becomes active as the door D12 closes in a straight downward fashion. The weatherseal W12 will provide extra protection for non-standard installations (e.g., a larger 0.750″ thick version of the seal) while maintaining the same low CLD at less than 1 pound at ⅜″ closed gap. An overcompression volume V12 is also present.

Example 13

FIG. 20 depicts a thirteenth example of a weatherseal W13 incorporating certain of the technologies described herein, in an uncompressed state. The weatherseal W13 includes a profile curve PC13 defined a central linear neck section N13 that is bounded by two hinges H13, H13′. Two lumens 1-2 are present. The two hinges H13, H13′ provide secondary relief when the door is closed. On the hinge side of the door, the upper hinge H13 bends, after which the lower hinge H13′ becomes the active hinge point. On the lock side of the door, the upper hinge H13 becomes active as the door closes in a straight downward fashion. The large size of lumen 1 forms a highly conformable upper leaf U13. As the weatherseal W13 is compressed, the upper leaf U13 rotates into the closed position, reducing the need for the upper leaf U13 tip to drag across the surface of the door D13 on the lock side of the door. An overcompression volume V13 is also present.

Select Test Data

As described above, it is desirable that the TPE foam weatherseals described herein display performance similar to urethane foam weatherseals. Table 1 depicts results of Door Closing Force tests and compares a number of different products. Q-lon is a urethane weatherseal manufactured by Schlegel of Rochester, N.Y. FOAM-TITE™ is a foam TPE weatherseal manufactured by Amesbury Group, Inc., of Amesbury, Mass. These two products were tested and the performance was compared to a foamed TPE weatherseal consistent with EXAMPLE 7, above. As can be seen, the EXAMPLE 7 product has a lower closing force than the Q-lon product and significantly lower closing force than the Foam-Tite product, which is manufactured from a like TPE material. As such, the EXAMPLE 7 product displays very desirable performance properties.

TABLE 1 Door Closing Force Test Comparison Door Closing Force Door Compared Lab Test Test Nominal Closing to OEM Lbs/Ft Class Specimen Height Force Seal CLD Comment Q-Lon QEBD-650 0.650 13.2 100% 1.23 Newly installed seals Q-Lon QEBD-650 0.650 9.5 72% 0.97 24 hours after installation TPE Ex. 7 0.650 11.3 86% 1.08 Newly installed seals TPE Ex. 7 0.650 8.0 61% 0.92 24 hours after installation Foam- 12083 0.625 26.8 204% 3.40 Standard .625 Tite ™ production run Foam- 12001 0.650 34.3 261% 4.70 Standard .650 Tite ™ production run

Table 2 depicts various performance data for a foamed TPE weatherseal consistent with EXAMPLE 7 above, as compared to two Q-lon products. The data includes weatherseal reach, force to close, air leakage, and water penetration, before and after 250,000 cycles. The data indicates that the EXAMPLE 7 product displays desirable force to close and reach, even after the test cycles are performed. The weatherseal also passes both the air leakage and water penetration tests, consistent with the Q-lon products.

TABLE 2 Performance Data Test Comparison SINGLE OUTSWING DOOR (before and after 250k door cycles) Weatherseal Test Units U71 Q-Lon EX. 7 Weatherseal inch before 0.636 +/− 0.012 0.654 +/− 0.018 reach after 0.621 +/− 0.011 0.607 +/− 0.023 Force to lbs before 2.74 +/− 0.11 2.42 +/− 0.11 Latch after 2.33 +/− 0.09 2.41 +/− 0.13 ASTM E283 scfm/ft2 before Pass Pass Air Leakage after Pass Pass ASTM E547 design before Pass Pass Cyclic pressure, after Pass Pass water psf penetration

Table 3 depicts door seal CLD test data for Q-lon products, a FOAM-TITE™ product, and a number of examples of the above described low-CLD foam TPE products (specifically, EXAMPLES 4, 5, 7, and 10). CLD is measured for a newly-manufactured product. CLD is measured by compressing a 1″ sample of the tested weatherstrip having a nominal height of 0.650″. The weatherstrip is compressed at a compression rate of 1″/minute until compression of ⅜″ is reached. The compression is performed with a CHATTILON force gauge. Under such test conditions, a CLD of less than about 1.25 lb/ft of weatherstrip would be desirable. As can be seen, the tested samples consistent with EXAMPLES 4, 5, 7, and 10 display lower CLDs than the comparably sized Q-lon products. The FOAM-TITE™ weatherstrip without lumens displays a very high CLD.

TABLE 3 Door Seal CLD Test Comparison Compression Sample Force lb/ft QEBD 650 U71 Q-Lon 1.33 Foam-Tite ™ 12083 2.79 EXAMPLE 4 1.03 EXAMPLE 5 1.05 EXAMPLE 7 1.12 EXAMPLE 10 1.08

While there have been described herein what are to be considered exemplary and preferred embodiments of the present technology, other modifications of the technology will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the teachings herein. The particular methods of manufacture and geometries disclosed herein are exemplary in nature and are not to be considered limiting. It is therefore desired to be secured in the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the technology. Accordingly, what is desired to be secured by Letters Patent is the technology as defined and differentiated in the following claims, and all equivalents. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A weatherseal comprising: a stiffener configured to be inserted into a kerf of a doorframe; and a foam profile comprising: a first profile portion connected to the stiffener; a second profile portion comprising a tip; an elongate section extending between the first profile portion and the second profile portion; two hinges bounding the elongate section, wherein a first hinge is formed between the first profile portion and one end of the elongate section and a second hinge is formed between the second profile portion and the other end of the elongate section, wherein the first hinge and the second hinge each define a portion of the foam profile that bends when the tip of the second profile portion is acted upon by an external force, and wherein each hinge has a first portion of foam material that is under compression and a second portion of foam material that is under tension during bending; and an inner surface and an opposite outer surface, wherein when the foam profile bends, the inner surface is under compression and the outer surface is under tension, and wherein when each hinge bends, the first portion of foam material is proximate the inner surface and the second portion of foam material is proximate the outer surface.
 2. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein when the foam profile is in an uncompressed position, the second profile portion is disposed at an acute angle to the first profile portion.
 3. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein upon application of the external force to the tip of the second profile portion, the second hinge bends prior to the first hinge.
 4. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the stiffener comprises a first leg and a second leg, wherein the first leg is connected to the first profile portion.
 5. The weatherseal of claim 4, wherein the elongate section defines a longitudinal axis, and wherein the longitudinal axis is substantially orthogonal to the first leg of the stiffener.
 6. The weatherseal of claim 4, wherein the first profile portion is connected to the first leg along substantially all of a width of the first leg.
 7. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the weatherseal further comprises a resin coating at least a portion of the outer surface.
 8. The weatherseal of claim 7, wherein the resin coating on the first profile portion is reinforced.
 9. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the first profile portion has a cross-sectional shape different than a cross-sectional shape of the second profile portion.
 10. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first profile portion and the second profile portion defines a lumen.
 11. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the first profile portion defines a first lumen, and wherein the second profile portion defines at least one second lumen.
 12. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the foam profile comprises a closed-cell foam.
 13. The weatherseal of claim 12, wherein the closed-cell foam is thermoplastic elastomer (TPE).
 14. The weatherseal of claim 12, wherein the closed-cell foam is ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM).
 15. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the foam profile comprises a compression load deflection of less than about 1.25 pounds per foot, when compressed to a thickness of about ⅜ inch at a rate of about 1 inch/minute.
 16. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the stiffener is substantially rigid.
 17. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein when the foam profile is in a compressed position, an overcompression volume is defined between the first profile portion and the second profile portion.
 18. The weatherseal of claim 17, wherein when the foam profile is in an overcompressed position, the second profile portion is disposed at least partially within the overcompression volume.
 19. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein a lumen is defined within the elongate section.
 20. The weatherseal of claim 1, wherein the weatherseal is configured to resist water penetration. 